Concession · Places
AI descriptions do not prove visitor spending
I explain why a description of a place cannot, on its own, show that AI changes what visitors spend.
Insights
I write about judgment at work: who takes responsibility for an AI answer, what a claim can support and why a proposal can fail.
I explain why a description of a place cannot, on its own, show that AI changes what visitors spend.
I look at why a proposal can fail on price, and why blaming the buyer is not enough.
I argue that rules about tools and data do not settle who is responsible when someone acts on an AI answer.
I argue that offering something free means considering the attention it will need after it is running.
I have four pieces here so far. The latest is dated 17 August 2026. I publish when I have something worth adding.
If one of these arguments matters to your audience, tell me about your event.